Craig Ranke video compilations

Craig Ranke is the guest on the Matrix News Network ...
Posted by: lytetrip

Video duration: 592 seconds
Global video hits: 2341

Craig Ranke is the guest on the Matrix News Network with Kate and Richard discussing evidence regarding the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon.

Related: craig ranke, pentagon, 911, 911, cit, matrix news, deception, flyover, citgo, north side

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

I miss Kate & ...
By: mcc11505. on 14 Sep 10, 02:16:00
I miss Kate & Richard Mucci "Out There"?

Why? I guess that ...
By: Monarchias. on 13 Sep 10, 13:29:17
Why? I guess that those? mens are upper than mr obama puppet prime minister. Obama is not a leader and never be.

super la? ...
By: cetaitdemain. on 07 Sep 10, 20:18:05
super la? journaliste bisous de pascal

CIT is 100%? ...
By: bumblebee8banana. on 13 Aug 10, 05:08:14
CIT is 100%? garbage. citwatch . blogspot . com

(jacob)vision: ...
By: thedayitriedtodie. on 20 Oct 09, 21:20:26
(jacob)vision: thanks for posting, shill.?

ceetboy: thanks ...
By: thedayitriedtodie. on 20 Oct 09, 21:19:48
ceetboy: thanks for ur «usefull» comment, useless. u'll b usefull soon enough. (she's not even THAT hot that bothers ur penis comment? on an issue like this)... mmmm did u watch the whole video, or was it too long for ur attention span?

Well done Craig! ...
By: onesliceshort. on 19 Oct 09, 15:29:17
Well done Craig! Well spoken mate :)?

that girl host is a ...
By: ceetboy. on 19 Oct 09, 09:41:23
that girl host is a hot lady. some cougar or milf for? me lol. yummy.

Thanks for sharing ...
By: mcc11505. on 14 Oct 09, 18:41:05
Thanks for sharing & allowing comments too. I really appreciate files like? this because I do not sub to any TV service because I did not enjoy supporting murdoch, blitzer, maher, billo & beck with my money. USA & our dollar in trouble because fed reserve bernanke & pentagon gates do not represent best interest of americans. Why did obama retain bernanke & gates from bush's cabinet?

Everyone? should be ...
By: Bittermanscolon. on 05 Oct 09, 04:48:07
Everyone? should be aware.......unfortunately, that's why we're in the situation we're in.....

great video? , ...
By: viasly. on 19 Sep 09, 07:45:27
great video? , every one should see it

Why? I think they ...
By: lytetrip. on 19 Sep 09, 04:27:51
Why? I think they did an amazing job.?

It is as if Matrix ...
By: jacobvision. on 19 Sep 09, 04:26:14
It is as if Matrix news - Kate and Richard still defend the official story -? or they are reallly dumb ? then program doesn't deserve the name Matrix news.

Craig Ranke exposes 911 Pentagon witnesses
Posted by: pt1gard

Video duration: 846 seconds
Global video hits: 438

Latest comments made on this video:

There was a plane ...
By: Able Irato. on 15 May 12, 10:10:05
There was a plane overhead, there was an explosion. Whether they are related? if doubtful and not supported by any evidence. There were no planes used on 9/11 to impact anything. Question is were DEW used on the Pentagon or conventional explosives. The perfect hole with an undisturbed office inside indicates DEW.

Are? there no ...
By: tydeProductions. on 12 May 12, 15:08:15
Are? there no witnesses who saw the plane on the other side of the pentagon 'impact' side where it would have flown off had it gone over the pentagon while the explosion occured?

i guess at 8:30 the ...
By: pt1gard. on 02 Apr 12, 18:14:45
i guess at 8:30 the photo? doesnt PROVE another witness is lying, you can shill scum

Roosevelt? Roberts ...
By: Fippletest. on 31 Mar 12, 13:53:59
Roosevelt? Roberts who saw "another plane" that "wasn't a jet", not "the plane" fly away?

Your best friend ...
By: Fippletest. on 29 Mar 12, 14:06:30
Your best friend will therefore know that it works the other way, Physical evidence means nothing without a witness to vouch for the evidence. It is no good to plant a broken lamp pole in a court of law without a person to authenticate the object. It is all eventually a question of trust, which is very much a question of correct procedure. You Tubing is not eventually the most convincing? way to make a case. Courts of law know the difference between admissible evidence and propaganda.

First hand ...
By: MrSammo1. on 29 Mar 12, 13:38:47
First hand testimony of an eye witness (no matter how many) means nothing when the physical evidence proves them wrong. By the way, my best friend is a lawyer. ?

It is not a choice ...
By: Fippletest. on 29 Mar 12, 02:40:23
It is not a choice of mine? that hearsay fails to count while the first hand testimony of an eye witness does. This is jurisprudence, the rule of law and for good reason, were you intelligent enough to understand as much as that.

It's? your choice ...
By: MrSammo1. on 29 Mar 12, 01:53:18
It's? your choice to understand what you see or to believe what you've been told.

It is also possible ...
By: Fippletest. on 28 Mar 12, 18:32:15
It is also possible to distinguish? between imagining and perceiving. One sees a screen full of pixels. Another feels the heat, with a strong stench of aviation fuel in the air. Spot the difference.

not true a guy who ...
By: pt1gard. on 28 Mar 12, 04:46:34
not true a guy who worked in the Gon saw it fly away ... also,? you think there would be engines and wings, or did they burn up and fold into the walls .... go to my videos with Jeff Hill

? This is all so ...
By: Fippletest. on 28 Mar 12, 02:44:25
? This is all so incredibly stupid. 12 witnesses? Thousands of people saw 77 fly toward the building, kids at school, commuters on their way to work, workers in the buildings overlooking the Pentagon, you name it; they were there and they saw. Nobody, not a single individual saw it fly? away again.

What you fail to ...
By: MrSammo1. on 05 Jan 12, 05:38:44
What you fail to realize is 9/11 all comes down to personal perception. Did you realize the physical problems concerning other aspects of 9/11 from the get go? Most likely not. The Pentagon and Shanksville are by far the easiest of the total deception for most people to understand. You just may? not be one of them.

What are the other ...
By: cwlldoran. on 29 Dec 11, 10:59:34
What are the other possibilities do you? think? Like could I be someone who sees foolish inane accusations being made against people in public, on the internet, and sees other people believing them? And maybe thinks people are entitled to a defence? That would involve me not actually agreeing with what is being suggested here in this interview, and? elsewhere, so maybe you find that hard to imagine ,but that would be a failure of imagination on your part.

No, I raised a ...
By: StandUpForLiberty. on 28 Dec 11, 23:50:18
No, I raised a reasonable question: "What kind of person spends so much time on the internet trying to discredit researchers he supposedly thinks are crazy anyway?" There are multiple possible answers to that question. Full-on disinfo agent (ala Cass Sunstein) is one possibility, but you could also be a person who is? simply in deep denial about the evidence proving that 9/11 was a false flag operation, resulting in irrationality and monomania on your part when it comes to this subject.

>> assigned to ...
By: cwlldoran. on 07 Dec 11, 23:07:50
>> assigned to descredit this stuff? - the truth would disappoint you - another specious accusation , and I? know that for a fact.

A general statement ...
By: cwlldoran. on 07 Dec 11, 22:54:45
A general statement by definition doesn't need to contain specific examples , which is why I didn't include them. This is a comment section of Youtube where you, and presumably? I, are allowed to comment and I especially feel the need to do so when an interviewer on a radio station fails to challenge specious accusations being made in public against people who are not there to defend themselves. You are implying that I am some kind of disinfo agent >>

PhotonOverdose, ...
By: StandUpForLiberty. on 06 Dec 11, 20:52:51
PhotonOverdose, like cwildoran you provide nothing but empty, vulgar name-calling. This does not refute the evidence? presented.

cwildoran, you are ...
By: StandUpForLiberty. on 06 Dec 11, 20:48:23
cwildoran, you are just making generalized statements & provide zero specific examples of "absurd arguments" or "specious libelous accusations". This is just empty posturing by you to try to plant seeds of doubt about this evidence exposing 9/11 as a false flag op. What kind of person spends so much time on the internet trying to discredit researchers he supposedly thinks are crazy anyway?? Something for people to think about with regard to your comments on this and other 9/11-related videos.

$CIT - Craig Ranke\$

CIT - Craig Ranke's No Planer Flyover Theory Busted
Posted by: shure911

Video duration: 596 seconds
Global video hits: 1755

more info here - s1.zetaboards.com

Related: craig, ranke, aldo, marquis, flyover, cit, citizen, investigation, team, pentacon, national, security, alert, aa77, pentagon, 911

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Jeff since you are ...
By: centrino105. on 01 Jan 11, 15:17:40
Jeff since you are still clinging to the OCT about the pentagon, like the rest of the group thinkers at Blogger, I can say without any reservations that you still don't know squat about the pentagon issue. Please spare me the fake "Craig won't debate me now" yarn. He has debated you, soundly destroyed you,? and is willing to debate the top echelon CIT bashers such as Jim Hoffman and/or Victoria Ashley. His time would be wasted debating you again, try debating me and see how you do.

You could say I ...
By: shure911. on 30 Dec 10, 21:31:55
You could say I didn't really know? squat about the pentagon issue at the time I talked with Craig. I'd like him to try and debate me now that I have seriously researched the issue. The problem is he won't debate now ;)

Nearly ten years ...
By: muckletoon. on 30 Dec 10, 21:18:53
Nearly ten years and not a shred of video evidence the Pentagon was struck by a commercial plane, we all know how many unemployed actors life in the US. People will do? anything for money.

All of Storti's ...
By: StandUpForLiberty. on 20 Dec 10, 16:15:59
All of Storti's allegations in this video are lies. Craig Ranke of CIT wrote a detailed response documenting that this? is the case, which you can read here: tinyurl DOT com SLASH 272p7cg Or just Google "Open Letter to Steven Storti from Craig Ranke" in quotes In light of this there is no reason for this video to remain up on YouTube except for the purpose of smearing CIT with disinformation. It should be removed.

Jeff's "debate"? ...
By: centrino105. on 15 Nov 10, 22:01:30
Jeff's "debate"? with Craig Ranke was so embarrassing for Jeff. He didn't know squat about the North of Citgo eye witness testimony and that was obvious. Jeff really proved during that "debate" that he is badly misinformed about CIT's evidence and totally ignorant of the issues with the Pentagon. Jeff also conflates the claim that a plane hit the pentagon with the claim it flew north of the citgo station as though it is the same thing. It isn't Jeff they are two seperate issues to deal with.

You're right. ...
By: punxsutawneybarney. on 12 Nov 10, 01:29:01
You're right. CIT's goofy claims make the truth? movement look real bad.

what a shitty ...
By: riesenpimmel69. on 31 Oct 10, 21:59:05
what a shitty piece? of disinformation

? Where did the ...
By: punxsutawneybarney. on 20 Oct 10, 20:45:04
? Where did the flyover plane go? Think about it. It can't turn right and fly over the airport, wrong way against the incoming air traffic. It can't go straight ahead and cross the river parallel to a 12-lane bridge, fly over a golf course and a marina. It can only turn north--a spectacular aerobatic turn with a 80 degree bank angle performed over freeways after an explosion at the Pentagon?

I will stick with ...
By: Truthstorm911. on 11 Oct 10, 08:56:36
I will stick with CIT thank you very much. I find your presentation against them weak and based on false assumptions. Ever seen Criss Angel vanish his car while driving it? Youtube it and then tell me people could not have been fooled into thinking the plane hit the Pentagon. It is? called misdirection buddy. That big explosion covered the flyover AND convinced people the plane hit. Standard illusionist trick, and not complicated at all.

this is? an awesome ...
By: brokenstyx. on 18 Sep 10, 19:10:02
this is? an awesome video

Care to list a few? ...
By: LordBalto. on 14 Sep 10, 00:21:21
Care to list a few? Didn't think so. ?

CIT is 100% garbage ...
By: bumblebee8banana. on 13 Aug 10, 05:07:28
CIT is 100% garbage. citwatch . blogspot .? com

What video is that ...
By: justincgs. on 10 Aug 10, 08:24:47
What video is that at 7:52? !!! I have never seen that footage before!!!

check the link ...
By: shure911. on 15 Jul 10, 16:13:06
check the link below the video and you will? find many witnesses that saw the plane hit the Pentagon.

This? is a damn ...
By: YougeneDebs. on 21 Jun 10, 00:54:36
This? is a damn good job, Jeff! I love it when Jeff calls!

towlheads? ragheads ...
By: achimspok. on 20 Jun 10, 23:43:40
towlheads? ragheads? That's how Blackwater call them? No, they cannot pull off something like this. CIT is planted not pulled off. Their theory of a disappearing plane and mass hypnosis is as ridiculous as a boxcutter conspiracy and based on misinterpreted or twisted accounts. Other accounts are deleted because of a suspicious Jewish name or something similar. It comes down to 2 Pentagon police officers who appear not to be twisted. One of them probably never saw the? plane. watch?v=VefUF5w8Dz0

Stop throwing? ...
By: MrCointelPro. on 20 Jun 10, 23:23:07
Stop throwing? Bricks Craig!

You've heard? ...
By: shure911. on 20 Jun 10, 23:20:14
You've heard? enough eh?

no, i have heard ...
By: BrickUnit. on 20 Jun 10, 23:04:39
no, i have heard enough though, the one with the lady crawling out of the pentagon with her colleges, wasnt a plane anywhere to be? seen

So have you? went ...
By: shure911. on 20 Jun 10, 23:02:49
So have you? went and listened to all the eyewitness conversations yet?

Damn this guy is ...
By: BrickUnit. on 20 Jun 10, 22:32:30
Damn this guy is the best so far, he has got to be an actor? or something, for almost a second there i actually started to believe what he was saying, but then again if we cant plug an oil leak what makes him think towlheads can pull off something like this

Craig Ranke on Lloyde England at the Granada Forum
Posted by: lytetrip

Video duration: 599 seconds
Global video hits: 2973

Craig Ranke of Citizen Investigation Team breaks down the details regarding the account of Pentagon attack taxicab driver Lloyde England as exposed in their recent presentation, The Eye of the Storm. See www.CitizenInvestiga tionTeam.com for more details.

Related: 911, pentagon, attack, conspiracy, theory, evidence, taxicab, lloyde, england, lloyd, lightpole, lightposts, light, pole, cab, deception, confession, lies, north, citgo, flightpath, flight, path, navy, annex, gas, station, flyover, fly, over, explosion, explosives, false, flag, wtc, world, trade, center, northside, 757, 77, flight77, aa77, aal77, american, airlines, rb-211, ntsb, coverup, radar, 84, rades, osama, bin, laden, terror, security, hijack, hijackers, hani, hanjour, terrorists, pilots, pilot

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Light poles are? ...
By: xEllessdee25x. on 12 Apr 12, 11:27:47
Light poles are? fucking heavy.

What you had better ...
By: Fippletest. on 30 Mar 12, 19:59:58
What you had better do then is find your way to a court of law to prove your case; ? charge the thousands of ordinary people who must have known with the conspiracy to murder their? fellow citizens instead of farting about with You Tube Everyone who purports to act in the name of truth ought at least to be entitled to a moment of truth every now and then, to discover the truth about themselves if nothing else.

Terry Morin, on the ...
By: Fippletest. on 30 Mar 12, 19:47:32
Terry Morin, on the south side of the Navy Annex, saw an aircraft fly over his head that he identified as a 737. ? For my money, that is close enough to certain that it was flight 77 that he saw, on its way directly to the Heliport. A line drawn along the southern edge of the Navy Annex leads slightly to the south of the lamp pole area. Toward on the other side of the Annex is where it would appear to be as it it approached the Navy Annex, from a distance, viewed from the Cemetery.

The most ridiculous ...
By: Fippletest. on 30 Mar 12, 19:33:34
The most ridiculous thing about this? is that when it was first pointed out that 5 poles were felled the original reaction that was incredulity. The thanks I got for pointing this out was to be called a liar because it had not been noticed, was not an issue, that as many as the 5 poles were damaged.

"I'm not supposed ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 23:07:01
"I'm not supposed to be involved in this. This is for other people, people who have money and all this kind of stuff. Well, I'm not supposed? to be involved with this. I don't have nothing."

I am accusing ...
By: EdjeBos. on 21 May 11, 15:00:34
I am accusing someone who says 'I shouldn't be involved in this, this is for rich people'?? How do you figure that? I'm not accusing him of anything he doesn't admit himself. If anything, I? feel sorry for him. He seems like a really nice guy. You act like it's a hard to pressurize someone. And I can't believe you are thát naieve, so yes, I dare to assume you are a lying shill.

bla?
By: EdjeBos. on 21 May 11, 14:46:50
bla?

Damn! I knew ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 10:42:25
Damn! I knew someone? would spot the name! I told them! I said shouldn't I use another name , it's way too obvious, but they said if hundreds of people can't see a Boeing 757 flying over the Pentagon in broad daylight then they'll never spot it. It's a fair cop. You can come along to the Pentagon and arrest me. Go to Ring C office 246 , but be careful in the corridor outside ,they are bending some lightpoles or something.

>>would be the ' ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 10:32:45
>>would be the 'agent' 'at the? eye of the storm' being traduced all over the internet by self-deluded people who think it's ok to accuse other people of involvement in mass murder but who bristle with self-rightous indignation when anyone even criticises them, and who can't imagine that anyone would defend someone they accuse of involvement in mass murder, since they have pronounced them guilty. The only explanation for that must be that they are as guilty as he is...

watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 10:20:54
watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho and tell me one thing he says that you can't read on thousands of websites all over the internet for years. Lloyde England can do a seach for his name and find hundreds of? websites, bloggs,forums , articles saying that he is involved in a some big military black-op deception false flag operation cover-up with himself 'at the eye of the storm'. If he had passed that spot 5 seconds earlier you would never had heard of him but some other unfortunate individual>>

I saw on your ...
By: EdjeBos. on 19 May 11, 22:39:46
I saw on your channel you already know of the vid. You shills should really put more effort? in the make-up of your channel. They all look the same! Nice of you to honour your employer with your username. Good boy!

I doubt strongly ...
By: EdjeBos. on 19 May 11, 22:34:05
I doubt strongly you want to know, but watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho, ? from 6:45. Tell me, what is he talking about?

Lloyde England says ...
By: pentagon28. on 19 May 11, 21:14:22
Lloyde England says was driving past the Pentagon when a plane flew over and hit a lightpole that smashed into his car. I'm wondering why an eyewitness who says 'I think the plane flew over here' is considered accurate but someone who says 'a lightpole crashed into my car' is considered a liar, considering that there is not one eyewitness who? said 'the plane did not crash into the building'.

I really? don't ...
By: EdjeBos. on 13 May 11, 14:28:04
I really? don't understand how this is still discussed!! Lloyde has admitted his involuntary involvement in this planned event in unmistakable terms. People, WWII hás happened. There really are people in power capable of unspeakable acts against other human beings. This shit DOES happen. And yes, it wás your government. Is that really so hard to believe? Stop hiding behind ignorance and naïveté. Grow up.

Sean Boger , who? ...
By: cwlldoran. on 08 Apr 11, 20:40:06
Sean Boger , who? is an 'expert witness' said the plane crashed into the building.

I suppose that is ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 20:29:19
I suppose that is my position too? so, fair enough.

>>I think that ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 17:47:07
>>I think that deserves ridicule to be honest. He is going around giving presentations and publicly accusing this man , and others like the construction manager at the Pentagon ,of involvement in mass murder then something better that 'he wouldn't? have taken the light pole out of his windshield' is required.

The whole point of ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 17:36:24
The whole point of this really is what is plausible and what isn't - the idea of? some elaborate plan involving a faked event with a light pole knocked over by a plane that didn't fly anywhere near it - even from the point of view of arranging for him to arrive at some point on the road when no one could know exactly when a plane was going to arrive, and be sure there would be no other traffic in the way, a traffic jam, a car ahead, cars behind- and for what ? >>

Lloyde didn't have ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 17:22:42
Lloyde didn't have 100 people to ask what he would do with the pole in his windsheild. Do you really think his car insurance would be uppermost on his mind? at the time? I really can't imagine a cop coming along and him saying, 'I know there are maybe hundreds of people killed over there, but I want to report damage to my car from this light pole.' Can you think of a reason for him to pretend a lightpole came through his windscreen and that he removed it before anyone saw it?>>

If a giant pole ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 11:49:30
If a giant pole smashed through my windsheild,having just had the rather frightening experience of having a giant lightpole smash through my windsheild after being hit by a low flying aircraft, with potentially hundreds of people having? just died a hundred yards away in the nations military head quarters, I don't know what I'd do. What then do I think someone else I don't even know would do in those circumstances -I can't imagine there are many things less obvious.

the problem is both ...
By: o0smokingmonk0o. on 22 Nov 10, 22:09:47
the problem is both sides don't want? you questioning their conclusions. If I think the official story isn't on the up and up i'm a heathen, and If i don't believe in reptilian people i'm an illuminati plant. You just can't win these days.

My mama always told ...
By: cwlldoran. on 04 Jul 10, 23:26:50
My mama always told me.. "Son , never , never take a lightpole out of someones car , especially if the Pentagon is burning in? the background....you let the authories do that... you hear me...?" I'm sure we have all been told that at one time or another.. It just shows what happens when evidence is not assessed in an unbiased and rational way, with part of the evidence of some witnesses having a 'PROVEN -DO NOT RE-ASSESS' sticker put on it.

pentagon28, yeah, ...
By: seekYEthetruth. on 02 Apr 10, 09:10:03
pentagon28, yeah, thats the one..?

pentagon28, yeah,? ...
By: seekYEthetruth. on 02 Apr 10, 09:09:59
pentagon28, yeah,? thats the one..

Is that the same ...
By: pentagon28. on 02 Apr 10, 01:55:47
Is that the same David Icke, goalkeeper and sports presenter who years? ago suddenly announced that he was the Son of God?

Craig Ranke on Matrix News Network part 2
Posted by: lytetrip

Video duration: 600 seconds
Global video hits: 1246

Kate and Richard Mucci from Matrix News Network interview Craig Ranke with Citizen Investigation Team regarding the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. www.citizeninvestiga tionteam.com

Related: pentagon, 911, craig ranke, cit, flyover, war, witnesses, witness, deception, conspiracy

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

As much as I do NOT ...
By: LisaDawnn. on 26 Dec 11, 16:01:30
As much as I do NOT believe a plane hit the Pentagon, I can't see how a 'clean up crew' and the 'deceptive team' were immediately deployed to set up a staged events (like England's taxi). I mean who would know to stage a pole in his windshield?...and for what reason? How would "they" know that we'd be questioning the southern approach of this plane to begin with? I think Craig did an outstanding interview but he poses? more questions than we had before.

Craig Ranke "The ...
By: cwlldoran. on 19 Feb 11, 10:33:01
Craig Ranke "The plane had to fly over the? building and fly up river" - where Roosvelt Roberts could not have seen it.

yet they are ready ...
By: amatorynumber. on 14 Jan 11, 07:15:44
yet they are ready to comprehend that there are FOREIGN people in this world capable of being this devious and murderous. In other words, they are ready to believe a bunch of poor arabs would have no second thoughts about killing americans and yet it is impossible for them to think that a bunch of rich powerful? son of a bitches would figure out how to do just the same thing. We live in a sick world and we need to heal it by waking the fuck up.

The official flight ...
By: anastasia58able. on 09 Jan 11, 22:51:31
The official flight path? has been justified by Journal of 911 Studies. This man is relying upon the most unreliable evidence - eye witness testimony

Thanks for the nice ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 04 Oct 10, 01:09:15
Thanks for the nice comments--As for the many "intelligent people" who still insist on believing in"The official story",I think they just "cant handle the truth".Also I think that many people just arent capable of comprehending that there are people in this? world capable of being this devious and murderous.Its like asking a sheep to understand how a wolf thinks.

Wish I could play ...
By: jacobvision. on 04 Oct 10, 00:49:04
Wish I could play the piano - nice to meet you. In the meantime I went through the website of Kate and Richard and agree, I was wrong with my conclusion. Thank you for telling me. Btw: I have? spoken with many intelligent people, tried to explain them what really happened and they still believe the official story.

I met these two,and ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 03 Oct 10, 23:18:58
I met these two,and they're? 100% against the official explanation,as all intelligent peple are..

ok, my comment was ...
By: jacobvision. on 03 Oct 10, 19:00:34
ok, my comment was more based on the way they kind of laughed at Craigs explanation of what happened. Whether Kate and Richard are on the truther side or not was unkown to me and? I still don't know them. For me tooit was clear from day one that it was all a militairy operation and I have great respect for the complete movie citizen investigation and their effort to expose the pentagon fraud.

They DONT buy the ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 03 Oct 10, 17:26:54
They DONT buy the official? story----

Saw? thru this ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 03 Oct 10, 17:22:20
Saw? thru this fraud on day 1.

(jacob)vision: ...
By: thedayitriedtodie. on 20 Oct 09, 21:25:09
(jacob)vision: thanks for posting,? shill.

thanks for sharing, ...
By: mcc11505. on 14 Oct 09, 19:08:26
thanks for sharing, i enjoy kate & richard. I think they did gr8 job here too. Now i understand the no-plane theory.?

Not sure what ...
By: StandUpForLiberty. on 21 Sep 09, 01:00:06
Not sure what you're talking? about jacobvision. It seems clear to me that Kate and Richard do NOT believe the official story at all and support CIT's research.

State your case. ...
By: lytetrip. on 19 Sep 09, 04:31:49
State your case. In my opinion they did an? exceptionally well job of presenting information from a skeptical yet unbiased perspective.

It is as if Matrix ...
By: jacobvision. on 19 Sep 09, 04:19:01
It is as if Matrix news - Kate and Richard still defend? the official story or they are reallly dumb and don't deserve the name Matrix news.

Craig Ranke Insane Truther Theater
Posted by: buddhaglass

Video duration: 57 seconds
Global video hits: 624

Insane Truther Theater with Craig Ranke. Special thanks to Billie Whitelaw and Samuel Beckett.

Related: insane, truther, theater, craig, ranke, pentacon, 911, truth, truthers, pentagon, billie, whitelaw, samuel, beckett, not

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

911 and Jeff (S)Hill on the Pentagon
Posted by: pt1gard

Video duration: 185 seconds
Global video hits: 103

SITEJACK: The 911blogger.org Story
Posted by: 911truthNOTlizards

Video duration: 557 seconds
Global video hits: 185

ALT LINK www.dailymotion.com Conspiracy Cultists with an axe to grind. This is their story. Related links: 911review.com forums.911newscentra l.com http

Related: jeff, jacobucci, adam, syed, craig, ranke, 911blogger.org, 911newscentral.com, 911blogger, 911, news, central, domain, hijacking, theft, censorship, hypocrisy, epic, fail, aldo, marquis, domenick, dimaggio, cit, shelia, casey, rock, creek, free, press, citizeninvestigationteam.com, pilotsfor911truth.org, the, theprogressivemind.info, wtcdemolition.com, redactednews.com, join911truth.com, truth, movement

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

9/11 Pentagon Witnesses - They Saw the Plane Hit!
Posted by: shure911

Video duration: 245 seconds
Global video hits: 5590

www.pumpitout.com

Related: 911, pentagon, craig, ranke, cit, national, security, alert, pilots, for, truth, september, 11, 2001, rob, balsamo, dwain, deets, pentacon

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

If you don't know ...
By: Fippletest. on 31 Mar 12, 02:11:30
If you don't know what hit the Pentagon you have not done you homework, or so completely paranoid that there is no cure. The Pentagon Building Performance Report? is perfectly plausible. I have yet to see a fault identified, as a matter of fact.

But yeah, could you ...
By: merlock101. on 10 Oct 11, 16:29:52
But yeah, could you give me a logical explanation to where that debris came from? Again, do you think they dragged it in for photos with everyone looking? Or maybe that they dropped? it from another airplane up above? And what about the airplane engine which I actually found pictures of buried in the rubble? Did they plant that there too?

lol, have you not ...
By: merlock101. on 10 Oct 11, 16:28:47
lol, have you not SEEN the picture of the massive chunk of metal with part of the "American Airlines" name on it? I think a thorough forensic identification might be a bit of a waste of money considering anyone with half a brain was perfectly? aware of the fact that it was a plane that crashed into the Pentagon. That is, assuming there was no forensic investigation like you say. Proof? But yes, there was an abundance. Most of it was simply INSIDE the wreckage.

"Not from an ...
By: alawson911. on 10 Oct 11, 10:20:38
"Not from an airplane though of course!" The? following fact turns your sarcasm back on you: No debris from any of the 9/11 crashes was ever forensically identified, so you only THINK it came from an "airplane" or, specifically, a Boeing 757; you cannot possibly know where it came from. But you have to admit that there was not an "abundance" of debris, as you have stated, no matter where it came from. That's all from me. Think what you like, it is of no further concern to me.

Where it came from? ...
By: merlock101. on 10 Oct 11, 06:43:35
Where it came from? Well I guess it all just? dropped out of the sky then. Not from an airplane though of course! Or maybe you think that some crew brought in pieces of airplane debris for the photos and then hauled it away - all in plain view of the public of course. Makes perfect sense! I'm not insulting the public's intelligence. Most of them are rational people who know that 9/11 wasn't a government conspiracy. You on the other hand... I'll insult your intelligence all I want.

Well, if the " ...
By: alawson911. on 10 Oct 11, 00:46:58
Well, if the "public" would like to Google "pentagon lawn 911 debris" and then click on images, your absurd claim will be blown. There are several pictures of the piece I mentioned and one or two others shots of people carrying debris, but where it? came from is not explained. That is all of the "the abundance of photographic evidence available". Now why don't you get your story straight, and stop insulting my intelligence and that of the "public".

This is a public ...
By: merlock101. on 09 Oct 11, 23:30:14
This is a public discussion, so I'm not going to send you a personal message. I want the world to see your response. And my bad, I'm having a separate debate somewhere else about Flight 93. It's easy to get mixed up because the main argument for both of them is that there? was "no plane debris found" afterwards, both arguments which can be easily debunked with a Google image search. So my mistake, Google "plane debris Pentagon" and you'll see all you need.

@merlock101 You can ...
By: alawson911. on 09 Oct 11, 02:45:14
@merlock101 You can send links in personal? comments and messages. But what has flight 93 got to do with the Pentagon lawn? You are not very well up on these things, are you.

The engine cores ...
By: alawson911. on 09 Oct 11, 02:42:13
The engine cores would have been intact; in fact an engine core was photographed, but it was not part of an RB211 engine as fitted to the alleged? 757 of American Airlines. Do some research yourself. Why are the 80 surveillance tapes still being suppressed? If there had been a 757 impact, you don't think these would have been released. You must look at the body of evidence, or the lack of it. The body of evidence indicates that a Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon. That's all.

And secondly, the ...
By: merlock101. on 09 Oct 11, 01:02:09
And secondly, the absence of evidence that YOU have seen is not proof of absence. It's not even evidence. And if the engines were deeply embedded in a ton of wreckage, I don't really think they would be all that easy to? photograph. And again, I asked you to demonstrate how you KNOW that the engines would have been intact. I think it's highly unlikely.

I'm not asking you ...
By: merlock101. on 09 Oct 11, 00:57:05
I'm not asking you to prove my point for me. I'm just suggesting that you look at the abundance of? photographic evidence available by a simple Google search. I'm actually astounded that a conspiracy theorist hasn't made a similar search to serve his own interests already... in any case, I would link you myself but as you should be aware, YouTube doesn't allow URL posting in comments. So - Google "flight 93 debris" and you'll see my proof.

@merlock101 No. You ...
By: alawson911. on 08 Oct 11, 10:46:21
@merlock101 No. You are asking me to prove what you have stated is true. It doesn't work that way. I have seen many pictures of the Pentagon lawn, which was, basically, free of debris except for that one piece. You have give me a reference for what YOU mean. As for the engines, of course they would have been photographed, had they? been there, don't be ridiculous. They were not there. The absence of evidence IS the evidence, also as in the case of the missing surveillance tapes.

The answer to your ...
By: merlock101. on 08 Oct 11, 07:38:47
The answer to your first request? is a very easy Google search away. As for the engines, I'm going to need you to give me some proof of that. You'll also have to demonstrate to me how their absence in photographs is any kind of indication that they weren't there to begin with.

There was one piece ...
By: alawson911. on 08 Oct 11, 02:06:49
There was one piece of debris photographed in close-up, quite close to the road. Send me a link to "all the photos of airplane debris scattered across the? Pentagon lawn?" What about the two 4-ton Roll-Royce RB211 engines attached to AA 757s? They were never photographed or identified inside or outside of the building. The cores of such engines would have survived, as did the core of one of? the engines from the plane that hit the South Tower. What happened to them?

What about all the ...
By: merlock101. on 07 Oct 11, 23:44:53
What about all the photos? of airplane debris scattered across the Pentagon lawn?

and i guess the 100 ...
By: SteAndKel. on 20 Sep 11, 18:14:40
and i guess the 100+ eyewitnesses, the phonecalls made by passengers on the plane (who are now dead), and? the physical evidence which shows pieces of a plane within the wreckage is irrelevant to you? ok...

and i guess the 100 ...
By: SteAndKel. on 20 Sep 11, 18:14:34
and i guess the 100+ eyewitnesses, the phonecalls made by passengers on the plane (who are now dead), and the physical evidence? which shows pieces of a plane within the wreckage is irrelevant to you? ok...

it was a plane... ...
By: SteAndKel. on 17 Sep 11, 14:58:10
it was a plane... it knocked down telephone wires and street lamps as it approached the pentagon... and this is supported by photographic? evidence... a missile could not have done this! only a plane!

9/11 was an ...
By: ZionistsRunTheGov. on 03 Aug 11, 02:11:35
9/11 was an inside job.?

This is such horse? ...
By: ozmangolfer. on 28 Jun 11, 03:25:24
This is such horse? shit, nobody saw anything.

dude "physical ...
By: Oz1976. on 29 Apr 11, 23:08:26
dude "physical evidence"...there's plenty. Bodies recovered that were fused to airplane seats. The front landing gear shot through the ring and came out that hole in the inner ring. Torn pieces of fueselage all over? the place. Seriously man, that's alot of physical evidence. Witness testimony + physical evidence. And you deny it still. You veil it as if to say you're not a conspiracy theorist...but you are...it's quite clear.

dude "physical ...
By: Oz1976. on 29 Apr 11, 23:08:13
dude "physical evidence"...there's plenty. Bodies recovered that were fused to airplane seats. The front landing gear shot through the ring and came out that hole in the inner ring. Torn pieces of fueselage? all over the place. Seriously man, that's alot of physical evidence. Witness testimony + physical evidence. And you deny it still. You veil it as if to say you're not a conspiracy theorist...but you are...it's quite clear.

You're an idiot. ...
By: Oz1976. on 29 Apr 11, 23:04:12
You're an idiot. youtube . com/watch?v=DIfwsjF8X5U&feature=feedf Witness testimony. Pieces of fuselage that say "american airlines part no#:" You are? not a special butterfly that's figured out what would be the "largest conspiracy ever" in our country. 911 was an outside job. Time to deal with it.

You're an idiot. ...
By: Oz1976. on 29 Apr 11, 23:04:06
You're an idiot. youtube.com/watch?v=DIfwsjF8X5U&feature=feedf Witness testimony. Pieces of fuselage that say "american airlines part no#:" You are not a special butterfly that's figured? out what would be the "largest conspiracy ever" in our country. 911 was an outside job. Time to deal with it.

Stonewalled or they ...
By: mrfrednoname. on 06 Mar 11, 04:56:29
Stonewalled or they simply don't have anything that would prove you right??? Probably the latter. I have yet to see any proof of any explosives being planted on any of the buildingds and there is not one of you that can explain why many eyewitnesses say they saw a plane hit the pentagon if one didn't. It is clearly possible for the events of 9/11 to happen? just like they did instead of these magical theories that are outright impossible without someone seeing something.

Jeff Hill Apologises to 9/11 WTC attack witness Jay Maisel
Posted by: shure911

Video duration: 135 seconds
Global video hits: 1428

Anonymous usernames try to smear me on the internet by uploading a phone call I made over 3 years ago to Jay Maisel. It is something I am very ashamed and sorry for ever doing. I spoke with Jay again and apologised for the call I made to him and he accepted my apology.

Related: jeff, hill, pumpitout, jay, maisel, 911, wtc, attack, witness, cit, craig, ranke, aldo, marquis, rob, balsamo, p4t, ua175, nobodyinparticular, nobodyinparticularly, nobodyinparticularly_4f5f2, funnybunnies, justice4all, djshure, shure

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Ranke Techno Chicken
Posted by: 911TNLZ

Video duration: 198 seconds
Global video hits: 130

VIDEO COVERED BY FAIR USE FOR SATIRE AND CRITICISM Citizen Investigation Team members have a history of calling people cowards... It takes one to know one. 911truthnotlizards.b logspot.com

Related: citizen, investigation, team, craig, ranke, aldo, marquis, balsamo, coward, hypocrisy, techno, chicken, nsa, debate, 911, truth, movement, pentagon, pilots, for, fly, over

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Jesse Ventura - Its about Entertainment not Truth
Posted by: pumpitoutdotcom

Video duration: 224 seconds
Global video hits: 3627

Jesse Ventura is making the rounds on television to promote his new book. Like so many others, Ventura has made a lot of money off of promoting lies about serious issues such as 9/11. What has he done for the truth besides discredit the research so many people have worked so long and hard on???

Related: jesse, ventura, conspiracy, theory, june, sarpong, michael, braverman, daniel, kucan, alex, piper, david, ray, griffin, rob, balsamo, dwain, deets, pilots, for, truth, cit, citizen, investigation, team, craig, ranke, aldo, marquis, 911, september, 11, 2001, pentagon, american, united, airlines, 175, 77, 93, betty, ong, renee, may, jane, allen, woodward, amy, sweeney, nancy, wyatt, mark, bingham, barbara, ted, olson, honor, elizabeth, wainio, jeremy, glick, ed, felt, fake, calls, air, phones, cell

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Nice!?
By: Medieviless. on 29 Mar 12, 17:40:02
Nice!?

Ey Einstein, ...
By: Medieviless. on 29 Mar 12, 17:37:30
Ey Einstein, newsflash! The show is called ''CONSPIRACY THEORY''. C-O-N-S-P-I-R-A-C-Y. Every ''show'' HAS to be entertaining in order to stay aired you inane piece of garbage! Tell me slick, what the fuck IS the truth? Why the fuck are you starting wars all over the place? Why the fuck are YOU in MY country? Ever heard of George Carlin? Google him you brainwashed dipshit! And get the fuck out of my country. You have enough problems on? your own. We don't need a poisoned leech to drain our blood!

lol ty for this. ?
By: goodfellow1984. on 09 Nov 11, 03:08:59
lol ty for this. ?

JESSE? FOR ...
By: Balizabet. on 08 Nov 11, 04:15:06
JESSE? FOR PRESIDENT!

/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ- ...
By: megamogx. on 10 Sep 11, 03:10:46
/watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o /watch?v=5qFsjdymqSk /watch?v=KhdppHwUJ9k /watch?v=zhnNy5EsebA /watch?v=iGqjzFQvfdI /watch?v=WxqoChniKVU /watch?v=9QWvkAgyIY4 /watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY /watch?v=HfmliaqIRBE /watch?v=HSjDCwN2i3w /watch?v=8XRMrMdn0NQ /watch?v=wKuLUu7SQU4?

Haha. So funny ...
By: michaelrose93. on 29 May 11, 20:33:27
Haha. So funny about the haters, but we must remember that the average Youtuber is about 15. We must cut these children some slack - after all, just a few years ago, they suffered traumatic disillusionment over the Tooth fairy and Santa Claus. Anyone that cannot see the bad, overdone acting, and the Hollywood 'scary soundtrack' effects for what they are, is clearly lacking a bit of capability in the critical thinking department. Beware? of false flag patriotism.

Yeah, even ...
By: jdh501. on 25 May 11, 18:14:49
Yeah, even Ventura's name is FAKE! Everything about this douchebag Jesse is FAKE, including his paranoid babblings. His real name? is Jim Janos and he was not even a real Navy Seal as he claims to be. You can get a real idea of his character by watching his old clips from his pro wrestling days. He has never really outgrown his fakery as an empty entertainer.

Hey, it's one thing ...
By: jdh501. on 25 May 11, 18:07:50
Hey, it's one thing to say that Jim "Jesse Ventura" Janos is just trying to wake people up, but he goes way beyond than that with his shtick; dramatic music, lies, and innuendo on his crappy little show. He's a douchebag faker and always has been. Imagine all the people he's libeling and slandering with his false accusations? of mass murder, conspiracy, etc. He has no conscience at all. BTW, that Tool vid? More mindless fear-mongering & paranoia. Typical. Grow up, conspiratroll.

Well for starters I ...
By: 911theinsidejob. on 25 May 11, 07:53:15
Well for starters I DIDN'T say all his conspiracy theories were BS. What I was trying to point? out is the fact that he is bringing questionable events to the light=that doesn't mean everything he says is true or false. This show does not exist because they are trying to wake people up, it's there because people will watch it, and it makes the network money. . So...you live in california huh? I have another tool song for ya watch?v=7TuqrEcf4tw get out why you still can.

You're an idiot. If ...
By: jdh501. on 24 May 11, 18:09:17
You're an idiot. If you admit? that Ventura's conspiracy theories may be all bullshit, then what exactly are people "waking up" to? Don't facts matter to you?? The end justifies the means?? WTF?

Jim "Jesse Ventura" ...
By: jdh501. on 24 May 11, 18:04:11
Jim "Jesse Ventura" Janos is? a complete douchebag, but at least he admits that he doesn't believe his own BULLSHIT. He's just an entertainer who wants to make lotsa MONEY by fooling gullible mentally ill conspiratards. In other words, he has no conscience at all. Then again, everything about him has ALWAYS been fake.

Yea I have seen all ...
By: nfgpunk888. on 25 Apr 11, 05:15:03
Yea I have seen all of the responses and just because he made alittle money doesnt mean that his theories are wrong and actually all of his theories are correct in my book and? he did no damage to any truth, everyone has to make some money to stay afloat in this system while trying to find a way to take it down.

UHHHH DUHHHHHHH, ...
By: 911theinsidejob. on 24 Apr 11, 16:18:17
UHHHH DUHHHHHHH, OMFG you guys are FUCKIN IDIOTS, no one is going to deny that his show is entertainment, they wouldn't put it on TV? if it wasn't going to "viewed", this in turn generates revenue. It doesn't matter weather or not you believe what he is saying, they don't care about that. What this show does have going for it is the fact that it can wake people up to what's going on in the world. It's one source of entertainment that has benefits. Anyways... . watch?v=hii17sjSwfA SadButTrue

I agree. He's said? ...
By: ev317. on 24 Apr 11, 15:46:35
I agree. He's said? before...

yes? its ...
By: JL0183. on 24 Apr 11, 13:00:08
yes? its entertainment WE JUST USE REALITY is what he said u wool spinning piece of spider shit! lol

lol??
By: Rebel4Life69. on 24 Apr 11, 11:56:44
lol??

........ We just ...
By: MajorHater99. on 24 Apr 11, 11:54:49
........ We just use REALITY Jesse Ventura's last words. And Obama was picked to be president long before 2008. He is a tool of TPTB , like the guy giving the interview on CNN. The guy is paid to lie and spread disinfo.? Not saying Jesse is a saint but I do think he means well and he's not lying his info is usually good and it's up to the indivisual to decide what's the truth.

KEEP TROLLING? ...
By: MacDonagh. on 24 Apr 11, 10:22:39
KEEP TROLLING? TROLLING TROLLING!

Well? duh
By: DonkeyHumper2011. on 24 Apr 11, 07:21:08
Well? duh

Seems Alex Jones is ...
By: Ox1ze. on 24 Apr 11, 06:58:55
Seems Alex Jones is the only credible person. Bye bye? Jesse Ventura.

Say what you want ...
By: JustinLB82. on 24 Apr 11, 06:54:23
Say what you want about the guy, but the fact that he brought this stuff into the mainstream on national TV has opened the eyes of many who not only would never have initiated their own "awakening," but have taken the torch and ran with it. Even if he backs out now to save his own ass, which I doubt he is, too late anyway, he has STILL? done more mass awakening than any of us. Until you or your YT channels are on TV supporting at least accountability in government, might I suggest fucking off.

"It's an ...
By: zapproowsdower. on 24 Apr 11, 06:02:51
"It's an entertainment? show. We just use reality." He said it in your own clip you retard. He uses "reality as entertainment". Reality = truth. Truth as entertainment. If you're really serious about slandering people, you should try some editing gimmicks. like arranging sound bytes to make him say he hates jews. Be creative. You don't need research, but rather a brain transplant.

Congrats.. you ...
By: Warlordx91. on 24 Apr 11, 05:50:25
Congrats.. you proved a reality show is on tv for entertainment, maybe next week you'll learn how to tie your shoes Not only that but Piers Morgan... really? That guy is the biggest piece of shit I have ever seen.. He acts like he is some sort of saint? yet all he does is useless reality shows and his lonely little "news" program.. Im not defending Jesse here but he was by FAR the better man in this argument, Piers only objective was to make Jesse look bad and its so obvious to see

It? is never said " ...
By: FooledToaster. on 24 Apr 11, 05:22:15
It? is never said "It's about entertainment not truth." Oh look, more lies.

Ok, I'll be sure to ...
By: pumpitoutdotcom. on 24 Apr 11, 05:17:23
Ok, I'll be sure to do? my research. You be sure to do your's too ;)

Dawn & Dan
Posted by: shure911

Video duration: 586 seconds
Global video hits: 287

more info - 911reports.wordpress .com

Related: 911, cit, craig, ranke, pentagon, american, airlines, flight, 77

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Page: 1 2

Golf Career Videos

Golf Career Related Videos

Golf Career Sponsors