Citizen Investigation Team video compilations

Debunking the Citizen Investigation Team in 11 Minutes
Posted by: 911debunkerschannel

Video duration: 660 seconds
Global video hits: 4299

Factual back-up, sources, and further research materials: 911debunkers.blogspo t.com

Related: citizen, investigation, team

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

NATIONAL SECURITY ALERT - 9/11 PENTAGON ATTACK
Posted by: BeautifulGirlByDana

Video duration: 4908 seconds
Global video hits: 450304

Visit the home site of the investigators: www.citizeninvestiga tionteam.com Subscribe to receive email updates concerning their investigation here cli.gs Endorsements for the presentation can be read here: www.citizeninvestiga tionteam.com A step-by-step strategy as to how you can take action is outlined here: www.citizeninvestiga tionteam.com Feel free to leave comments but please keep it civil.

Related: 911, pentagon, pentagon attack, pentagon witnesses, witness, eyewitness, eyewitnesses, conspiracy, craig ranke, aldo marquis, citizen investigation team, cit, the pentacon, flyover

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Israel did 911? as ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 26 May 12, 16:33:26
Israel did 911? as a?? false flag operation to get America to destroy? the? enemies of? Israel. To? learn? more about WHO did 911,? go to: ZION CRIME FACTORY(.)com and all? your questions will be answered. Also? watch the? YouTube? video: 911 MISSING?? LINKS And the? Truth will set the? World free!

I used to think ...
By: holdouts. on 26 May 12, 12:50:03
I used to think folks? that believed conspiracy theories were nuts, cooks, etc. Called them names like the current non-believers. Then watched a few videos that woke me up. First watch ex-CIA Susan Lindauer tell her story. She was locked up for a year under the patriot act. Why? Because she was going to tell how CIA knew about 9/11 back in April 2001. But it was this video and the oklahoma city bombing coverup that changed my beliefs on whether or not our gov't would lie to us. The answer is yes.

Don't know what ...
By: holdouts. on 26 May 12, 12:39:40
Don't know what happened to the people on the plane. We are on a fact seeking mission. And the facts show that a plane did not hit? the pentagon. But since our gov't had no problems killing their own in the pentagon, I doubt they cared much what happened to the folks on the plane either. Are you saying all those eyewitnesses are lying (including 2 cops)?

Here are some hints ...
By: facebookprogrammer. on 25 May 12, 15:29:34
Here are some hints military folks can answer to narrow down the missile type: 1) Its signature had NORAD slam ATOMIC doors @ Cheyenne Mtn for 1st time in military history (for a hijacking halfway across country?) 2) NORAD immediately launches Nuclear Retaliatory E4-B Doomsday? jet (hint) 3) Cheney/Rice rushed to ATOMIC bunkers. 4) Too fast/heavy to be shot down (narrows it down) 5) NORAD sent fighters over the Atlantic (sea launched) 6) Hit Pentagon? @ water line level. 7) Can't be? US origin.

The elite have? ...
By: facebookprogrammer. on 25 May 12, 14:54:45
The elite have? done a superb job distracting the American people w/ filth, Justin Bieber, scandals, FAIL blogs & porn. You seriously think some dumb teenage single propeller flight school drop out could overtake a 757, evade NORAD, fool the FAA/NSA & the US Air Force, switch off transponders simultaneously w/ no communication in hidden radar gaps not even top FAA officials knew of & outmanoeuvre Pentagon missile batteries while pulling off G manoeuvres top gun pilots drool over?

missile =pD4- ...
By: voodoowichdoctor. on 22 May 12, 18:02:52
missile =pD4-95RTzdw?

great job, on the ...
By: 77chicoloco. on 15 May 12, 03:49:51
great job, on the documentary, and for those none believers and close minded people keep living your life's in a perfect world. you'll are idiots believing the government tells the truth and? don't hide nothing and don't do shit like kill people, I think that the government did kill those people on the plane after it landed somewhere. why is it do hard to believe that? they did it so they can make a big profit on taking Iraq and making those fucked up laws like the patriot act. now they got more

FACADE ALREADY ...
By: Babblan007. on 10 May 12, 16:57:59
FACADE ALREADY COLLAPSED! official pentagon security video!(with animation) The facade is constructed with two offsets, you can barely see distal offset behinde ALREADY COLLAPSED GAP!!! Anomalies in video seen when watched frame by frame. Facade largely extended! No shadow from tail fin when plane is behind box. After screen flash rod appears right side of right box. Car drives in? to crash zone. Plane wrong scale,fuselage twice the lenght of facade. So no proof of crash of flight 77!

Israel did 911 as ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 10 May 12, 14:24:59
Israel did 911 as a?? false flag operation to get America to destroy the? enemies of? Israel. To learn? more about WHO did 911, go to: ZION CRIME FACTORY(.)com and all? your questions will be answered. Also? watch the? YouTube? video: 911 MISSING??? LINKS And the? Truth? will set the World free!

You made an idiotic ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 10 May 12, 14:17:55
You made an idiotic statement, and I asked you what it was supposed to prove; and then you say: "I don't know" So,? why did you make the statement? You show your hatred for White people, and then talk about "staying kind in a discussion"; are you a fucking comedian?

"I lost a friend in ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 10 May 12, 03:50:01
"I lost a friend in flight 11 and I had 25 people I knew in? the market die in the twin towers" And what the fuck is that supposed to prove? "What happened to all the pilots and passengers?" Nobody knows.....we can only speculate. I'm sorry about the friend you lost, but even if you lost? your whole family on 911, it would prove exactly nothing as far as physical laws go.

And what the fuck ...
By: Sockpuppet2012. on 10 May 12, 03:36:11
And what the fuck does that? prove?

Absolutely ...
By: imm0127. on 09 May 12, 21:11:50
Absolutely excellent? work!

Another part of? ...
By: JoseCleveland. on 08 May 12, 23:01:22
Another part of? Terrorists Plot ?

What if former HUD ...
By: JoseCleveland. on 08 May 12, 22:58:02
What if former HUD employee, who was working while Clinton was in Office,now has an illuminati micro-chip looking thing in her finger &under the skin ? She said she thought it must? have been placed in her skin and to arise at a certain time? ? Maybe. That's the advance physician stuff she had encountered while working for HUD &? someone tried to do her in & the feds/fbi and other doctors could not find it in 1990thru1993. Although WTC? There is the EXTRA DOT w/forecasted bomb @Olympics?

You are projecting. ...
By: blite13. on 08 May 12, 19:43:50
You are projecting..it is you who parrots your? TV....the TV has proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, to myself, that it is nothing but a lying propaganda box...way to go, sparky.

You? arrogant ...
By: MOZ6581. on 08 May 12, 19:30:44
You? arrogant bastard.

RRRRRRgggggHHHH!!!! ...
By: goldenknight777. on 06 May 12, 21:46:58
RRRRRRgggggHHHH!!!!!!?

Being there, taping ...
By: TuesdayMorningInSept. on 04 May 12, 08:34:01
Being there, taping all but the first strike.. the perspective is quite different. Not the sensational news media broadcasts.. "I watched the attack, and kept watching, Making comments from my heart, my mind, and intuition, without the influence of what some.. news agency was feeding? me."? 'Tuesday Morning in September' Preview; listen to the over two hour continuous running wtc attack chronicle on my channel.. in its entirety. Something new from that day; released a decade later

so who was this ...
By: JJTheJunkMan1. on 27 Apr 12, 04:11:25
so who was this friend you lost on 11 ? I only ask as? this is typically what someone says the second they have nothing else to say

Ted Olson?? Was ...
By: blite13. on 27 Apr 12, 01:00:15
Ted Olson?? Was that really his wife?

Craig Ranke on Matrix News Network part 2
Posted by: lytetrip

Video duration: 600 seconds
Global video hits: 1246

Kate and Richard Mucci from Matrix News Network interview Craig Ranke with Citizen Investigation Team regarding the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon. www.citizeninvestiga tionteam.com

Related: pentagon, 911, craig ranke, cit, flyover, war, witnesses, witness, deception, conspiracy

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

As? much as I do ...
By: LisaDawnn. on 26 Dec 11, 16:01:30
As? much as I do NOT believe a plane hit the Pentagon, I can't see how a 'clean up crew' and the 'deceptive team' were immediately deployed to set up a staged events (like England's taxi). I mean who would know to stage a pole in his windshield?...and for what reason? How would "they" know that we'd be questioning the southern approach of this plane to begin with? I think Craig did an outstanding interview but he poses more questions than we had before.

Craig Ranke "The ...
By: cwlldoran. on 19 Feb 11, 10:33:01
Craig Ranke "The plane had to fly over the building and fly up river" - where Roosvelt? Roberts could not have seen it.

yet they are ready ...
By: amatorynumber. on 14 Jan 11, 07:15:44
yet they are ready to comprehend that there are FOREIGN people in this world capable of being this devious and murderous. In other words, they are ready to believe a bunch of poor arabs would have no second thoughts about killing americans and yet it is impossible for them to think that a bunch of rich powerful son of a bitches would figure out how to do just the same thing. We live in a sick world and we? need to heal it by waking the fuck up.

The official flight ...
By: anastasia58able. on 09 Jan 11, 22:51:31
The official flight path has been justified by Journal of 911? Studies. This man is relying upon the most unreliable evidence - eye witness testimony

Thanks for the nice ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 04 Oct 10, 01:09:15
Thanks for the nice comments--As for the many "intelligent people" who still insist on believing in"The official story",I think they just "cant handle the truth".Also I think that many people just arent capable of comprehending that there are people in? this world capable of being this devious and murderous.Its like asking a sheep to understand how a wolf thinks.

Wish I could play ...
By: jacobvision. on 04 Oct 10, 00:49:04
Wish I could play the piano - nice to meet you. In the meantime I went through the website of Kate and Richard and agree, I was wrong? with my conclusion. Thank you for telling me. Btw: I have spoken with many intelligent people, tried to explain them what really happened and they still believe the official story.

I met these two,and ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 03 Oct 10, 23:18:58
I met these two,and they're 100% against the official explanation,as all? intelligent peple are..

ok, my comment was ...
By: jacobvision. on 03 Oct 10, 19:00:34
ok, my comment was more based on the way? they kind of laughed at Craigs explanation of what happened. Whether Kate and Richard are on the truther side or not was unkown to me and I still don't know them. For me tooit was clear from day one that it was all a militairy operation and I have great respect for the complete movie citizen investigation and their effort to expose the pentagon fraud.

They DONT? buy the ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 03 Oct 10, 17:26:54
They DONT? buy the official story----

Saw thru this fraud ...
By: mrbrianmccarthy. on 03 Oct 10, 17:22:20
Saw thru this fraud on day 1.?

(jacob)vision: ...
By: thedayitriedtodie. on 20 Oct 09, 21:25:09
(jacob)vision: thanks for posting,? shill.

thanks? for sharing ...
By: mcc11505. on 14 Oct 09, 19:08:26
thanks? for sharing, i enjoy kate & richard. I think they did gr8 job here too. Now i understand the no-plane theory.

Not sure what ...
By: StandUpForLiberty. on 21 Sep 09, 01:00:06
Not sure what you're talking about jacobvision. It seems clear to me that Kate and Richard do NOT believe the official story? at all and support CIT's research.

State your case. ...
By: lytetrip. on 19 Sep 09, 04:31:49
State your case. In my? opinion they did an exceptionally well job of presenting information from a skeptical yet unbiased perspective.

It is as if Matrix ...
By: jacobvision. on 19 Sep 09, 04:19:01
It is as if Matrix news - Kate and Richard still defend the official story or they are? reallly dumb and don't deserve the name Matrix news.

Roosevelt Roberts Jr. Explained
Posted by: brokenstyx

Video duration: 577 seconds
Global video hits: 686

An illustrated guide to Roosevelt Roberts Jr's two interviews, and enough tools for you to easily dismiss the false interpration of these from the Citizen Investigation Team. See through their lies! See through their obfuscations! DEMAND THE TRUTH! discussion thread here: s1.zetaboards.com

Related: pentagon, 911, 911, wtc, aa77, american, airlines, c-130, c130, roosevelt, roberts, jr, cit, citizen, investigation, team, debunk

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

seriously. this is ...
By: brokenstyx. on 10 May 12, 18:09:17
seriously. this is a quality video. i've got roosevelt's entire testimony completely explained here, as well as CIT's deceptions. i'd put money on roosevelt agreeing with me. at the moment, its on 6 likes and 10 dislikes. this is the state of the 911 truther community. ? and its thanks to CIT, richard gage, steven jones, niels harrit, simon shack, killtown, and a few others.

please note, CIT ...
By: brokenstyx. on 16 Feb 12, 13:53:23
please note, CIT never dared go on a podcast with me. i challenged them? publicly several times.

what part? didn't ...
By: brokenstyx. on 08 Sep 10, 02:38:59
what part? didn't you understand? the part where he saw a plane flying near the lightpoles? the part where he describes seeing the plane hit the WTC on the TV? the part where he saw a second plane flying the same direction the C-130 flew? hmm...

This is terrible. ...
By: iphrazel. on 08 Sep 10, 02:26:04
This is terrible. Your interpretation is far more confusing than CIT's is. You're putting words in Roosevelt's mouth. It harkens back to Clinton's word parsing on the stand or the definition of a hanging chad from the 2000 elections. You make some very strong claims without enough substance to back it? up. Thumbs down.

come on amadanish - ...
By: brokenstyx. on 05 Jul 10, 14:21:20
come on amadanish - why not try writing these? oh-so-scary questions?? lol

its a perfectly ...
By: brokenstyx. on 05 Jul 10, 14:16:24
its a perfectly logical breakdown. "all of you"? methinks ur a little paranoid.? you couldn't even rebut my answers here, then it was YOU who suggested running away to another forum. i can answer questions here just fine :) and i also showed you the link to where further questions are answered. you just don't like the fact that there was no flyover, and that CIT are being proven so conclusively wrong. soz x

You "advertised" an ...
By: amadanish. on 05 Jul 10, 13:56:46
You "advertised" an illogical breakdown of this guy's testimony as? can be seen in your half-ass answers to my questions which are answered at the link above. All of you start threads then run away back to pumpshitout. KP50 went to debate Debs at PSO and he is even hiding THERE!

(and everyone) i've ...
By: brokenstyx. on 04 Jul 10, 22:24:01
(and everyone) i've added a link to the? discussion thread in the video info.

"grow a pair"? do ...
By: brokenstyx. on 04 Jul 10, 21:37:03
"grow a pair"? do you think i don't go there coz i'm intimidated by your questions? i post almost everyday at pumpitout, come along to there - i simply advertised? my video on 911oz. and what questions am i avoiding?

Here man, grow? a ...
By: amadanish. on 04 Jul 10, 21:19:34
Here man, grow? a pair and go over to 911oz and answer the questions there. I've answered your nonsense there. 911oz . com / vbulletin / showpost . php ? p = 38555 & postcount = 30

The really telling ...
By: cwlldoran. on 04 Jul 10, 08:20:12
The really telling thing for me in that interview with Roosvelt Roberts is that he doesn't mention the 'third plane'. If the plane that these CIT people think he is talking about is some 'flyover' plane then the C-130 would be a third plane. No mention of it at all- he says there was a second plane but not a third plane. They don't ask him about the third? plane. The idea that anyone would use this confusing unclear interview as evidence of anything is pretty absurd.

"the plane that ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 22:49:29
"the plane that allegedly struck the Pentagon was seconds away from "impact" (which he never? mentioned by the way - no massive explosion - he just saw the plane then...nothing.)" actually he mentions the dust coming from the ceiling and people screaming. as can be heard in the video you are commenting on....) but no, he doesn't describe seeing the impact. he couldn't have seen it from his position. but he IS interview by the CMH as a witness to the plane. wonder why?

nothing. roosevelt ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 22:45:32
nothing. roosevelt says "like" it was timed. this is a form of simile. the two events are: 1. roosevelt hanging up the phone. 2. "flight 175"? hitting WTC2 on his television.

"you purposely used ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 22:43:06
"you purposely used an image of SLD minus the pedestrian bridges which give entry to the second floor." no i didn't. but you can still see the bridge area from the dock. (the bridge area with the lightpoles, which he also mentions). what was your question here? maybe you should try making an illustration? to describe your opinion that roosevelt couldn't have seen this bridge? ah, i know why....

he did not say he ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 22:39:07
he did not say he was watching the news for 40 minutes. far from it. and the fact he thought the WTC had been bombed, as opposed to struck by a plane, fits with this replay being his first viewing of the plane strike. on top of this, at 9:37 CBS9Washington are talking about the bombing of the WTC in the 90s, which also fits with roosevelt's description of? events. haven't you checked the TV archives to see if anything fits his testimony?

he'd not seen the ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 22:36:18
he'd not seen the footage of the plane at the WTC before. he works at the pentagon, an obvious military target. but he gives his own reason:? he thought they were "being invaded"

"he saw this ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 22:34:46
"he saw this obviously repeated tower? strike on TV "ran outside" (for God knows what" he gives a reason - he thought they were being invaded. it was the first time he'd seen the plane strike on TV. he? works at the pentagon. that's why he ran to attention, so to speak. and yes, several seconds later he saw the plane on its approach to the pentagon. not much of a coincidence, but coincidences do happen in some people's worlds :)

There's a few there ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 20:31:55
There's a few there. Take? your time.

hi danish what ...
By: brokenstyx. on 27 Jun 10, 16:01:19
hi danish what questions am i? not answering? please feel free to post them here. mind your language if you want them answering tho!

When he says "I saw ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 13:33:31
When he says "I saw another plane flying around the South Parking Lot" , and goes on to narrow it down to "lane 1 south parking above the lightpoles, you use the ridiculous image of the Pentagon from how many years ago? Apart from the fact that he wasn't in South Parking, you purposely used an image of SLD minus the pedestrian bridges which give? entry to the second floor. Yeah, "Great video"..

Are you trying to ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 13:32:40
Are you trying to say that this was the first time he had seen the second tower being struck in the 40 minutes from the first time he saw that a "news flash came across the TV and said the World? Trade Center has been bombed."?

For what logical ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 13:31:46
For what logical reason did he say that he "ran to the center of the dock" on seeing the second? tower being struck on TV?

3. You don't think ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 13:31:21
3. You don't think it's stretching it that he saw this obviously repeated tower strike on TV "ran outside" (for God knows what) and coincidentally just at? that moment the plane that allegedly struck the Pentagon was seconds away from "impact" (which he never mentioned by the way - no massive explosion - he just saw the plane then...nothing.)

What was "timed for ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 13:30:22
What was "timed for preciseness"??

You guys agree ...
By: amadanish. on 27 Jun 10, 13:27:50
You guys agree with? any crap spewed at Pumpshitout whether they are contradictory or pure disinfo. Broken Styx hasn't the balls to answer questions on his "work". Same goes for Shure.

Craig Ranke on Lloyde England at the Granada Forum
Posted by: lytetrip

Video duration: 599 seconds
Global video hits: 2973

Craig Ranke of Citizen Investigation Team breaks down the details regarding the account of Pentagon attack taxicab driver Lloyde England as exposed in their recent presentation, The Eye of the Storm. See www.CitizenInvestiga tionTeam.com for more details.

Related: 911, pentagon, attack, conspiracy, theory, evidence, taxicab, lloyde, england, lloyd, lightpole, lightposts, light, pole, cab, deception, confession, lies, north, citgo, flightpath, flight, path, navy, annex, gas, station, flyover, fly, over, explosion, explosives, false, flag, wtc, world, trade, center, northside, 757, 77, flight77, aa77, aal77, american, airlines, rb-211, ntsb, coverup, radar, 84, rades, osama, bin, laden, terror, security, hijack, hijackers, hani, hanjour, terrorists, pilots, pilot

Display Video Comments | Hide Video Comments | Add Comment

Latest comments made on this video:

Light poles are ...
By: xEllessdee25x. on 12 Apr 12, 11:27:47
Light poles are fucking heavy.?

What you had better ...
By: Fippletest. on 30 Mar 12, 19:59:58
What you had better do then is find your way to a court of law to prove your? case; ? charge the thousands of ordinary people who must have known with the conspiracy to murder their fellow citizens instead of farting about with You Tube Everyone who purports to act in the name of truth ought at least to be entitled to a moment of truth every now and then, to discover the truth about themselves if nothing else.

Terry Morin, on the ...
By: Fippletest. on 30 Mar 12, 19:47:32
Terry Morin, on the south side of the Navy Annex, saw an aircraft fly over his head that he identified as a 737. For my money, that is close enough to certain that it was flight 77 that he saw, on its way directly to the Heliport. A line drawn along the southern edge of the Navy Annex leads slightly to the south of the lamp pole area. Toward on the other side? of the Annex is where it would appear to be as it it approached the Navy Annex, from a distance, viewed from the Cemetery.

The most ridiculous ...
By: Fippletest. on 30 Mar 12, 19:33:34
The most ridiculous thing about this is that when it was first pointed out that 5 poles were felled the original reaction that was incredulity. The thanks I got for pointing this out was to be called a liar because it had? not been noticed, was not an issue, that as many as the 5 poles were damaged.

"I'm not supposed ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 23:07:01
"I'm not supposed to be involved in this. This is for other people, people who? have money and all this kind of stuff. Well, I'm not supposed to be involved with this. I don't have nothing."

I am accusing ...
By: EdjeBos. on 21 May 11, 15:00:34
I am accusing someone who says 'I shouldn't be involved in this, this is for rich people'?? How do you figure that? I'm not accusing him of anything he doesn't admit himself. If anything, I feel sorry for him. He seems like a really nice guy. You act like? it's a hard to pressurize someone. And I can't believe you are thát naieve, so yes, I dare to assume you are a lying shill.

bla?
By: EdjeBos. on 21 May 11, 14:46:50
bla?

Damn! I knew ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 10:42:25
Damn! I knew someone would spot the name! I told them!? I said shouldn't I use another name , it's way too obvious, but they said if hundreds of people can't see a Boeing 757 flying over the Pentagon in broad daylight then they'll never spot it. It's a fair cop. You can come along to the Pentagon and arrest me. Go to Ring C office 246 , but be careful in the corridor outside ,they are bending some lightpoles or something.

>>would be the ' ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 10:32:45
>>would be the 'agent' 'at the eye of the storm' being traduced all over the internet by self-deluded people who think it's ok to accuse other people of involvement in mass murder but who bristle with self-rightous indignation when anyone even criticises them, and who can't imagine that anyone would defend someone they accuse of involvement in mass murder, since they have pronounced them guilty. The only explanation for? that must be that they are as guilty as he is...

watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho ...
By: pentagon28. on 21 May 11, 10:20:54
watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho and tell me one thing he says that you can't read on thousands of websites all over the internet for years. Lloyde England can do a seach for his name and find hundreds of websites, bloggs,forums , articles saying that he is involved in a some big military black-op deception? false flag operation cover-up with himself 'at the eye of the storm'. If he had passed that spot 5 seconds earlier you would never had heard of him but some other unfortunate individual>>

I saw on your ...
By: EdjeBos. on 19 May 11, 22:39:46
I saw on your channel you already know of the vid. You shills should really put? more effort in the make-up of your channel. They all look the same! Nice of you to honour your employer with your username. Good boy!

I doubt strongly ...
By: EdjeBos. on 19 May 11, 22:34:05
I doubt strongly you want to? know, but watch?v=3GHM5f9lVho, from 6:45. Tell me, what is he talking about?

Lloyde England says ...
By: pentagon28. on 19 May 11, 21:14:22
Lloyde England says was driving past the Pentagon when a plane flew over and hit a lightpole that smashed into his car. I'm wondering why an eyewitness who says 'I think the plane flew? over here' is considered accurate but someone who says 'a lightpole crashed into my car' is considered a liar, considering that there is not one eyewitness who said 'the plane did not crash into the building'.

I really don't ...
By: EdjeBos. on 13 May 11, 14:28:04
I really don't understand how this is still discussed!! Lloyde has admitted his involuntary involvement in this planned event in unmistakable terms. People, WWII hás happened. There really are? people in power capable of unspeakable acts against other human beings. This shit DOES happen. And yes, it wás your government. Is that really so hard to believe? Stop hiding behind ignorance and naïveté. Grow up.

Sean Boger , who is ...
By: cwlldoran. on 08 Apr 11, 20:40:06
Sean Boger , who is an 'expert witness' said the plane crashed into the? building.

I suppose that is ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 20:29:19
I suppose that is my? position too so, fair enough.

>>I think that ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 17:47:07
>>I think that deserves ridicule to? be honest. He is going around giving presentations and publicly accusing this man , and others like the construction manager at the Pentagon ,of involvement in mass murder then something better that 'he wouldn't have taken the light pole out of his windshield' is required.

The whole point of ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 17:36:24
The whole point of this really is what is plausible and what isn't - the idea of some elaborate plan involving a faked event with a light pole knocked over by a plane that didn't fly anywhere near it - even from the point of view of arranging for him to arrive at some point on the road when no one could know exactly when a plane was? going to arrive, and be sure there would be no other traffic in the way, a traffic jam, a car ahead, cars behind- and for what ? >>

Lloyde didn't have ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 17:22:42
Lloyde didn't have 100 people to ask what he would do with the pole in his windsheild. Do you really think his car insurance would be uppermost on his mind at the time? I really can't imagine a cop coming along and him saying, 'I know there are maybe hundreds of people killed over there, but I want to report damage to my car from this? light pole.' Can you think of a reason for him to pretend a lightpole came through his windscreen and that he removed it before anyone saw it?>>

If a giant pole ...
By: cwlldoran. on 02 Jan 11, 11:49:30
If a giant pole smashed through my windsheild,having just had the rather frightening experience of having a giant lightpole smash through my windsheild after being hit by a low flying aircraft, with potentially hundreds of people having just died a hundred yards away in the nations military head quarters, I? don't know what I'd do. What then do I think someone else I don't even know would do in those circumstances -I can't imagine there are many things less obvious.

the problem is both ...
By: o0smokingmonk0o. on 22 Nov 10, 22:09:47
the problem is both sides don't want you questioning their conclusions. If I think the official story isn't on the up and up i'm a? heathen, and If i don't believe in reptilian people i'm an illuminati plant. You just can't win these days.

My mama always told ...
By: cwlldoran. on 04 Jul 10, 23:26:50
My mama always told me.. "Son , never , never take a lightpole out of someones car , especially if the Pentagon is burning in the background....you let the authories do that... you hear me...?" I'm sure we have all been told that at one time or another.. It just shows what happens when evidence is not assessed in an unbiased and rational way, with part of the evidence of some witnesses having a 'PROVEN -DO NOT RE-ASSESS' sticker put on? it.

pentagon28, yeah, ...
By: seekYEthetruth. on 02 Apr 10, 09:10:03
pentagon28, yeah, thats? the one..

pentagon28, yeah, ...
By: seekYEthetruth. on 02 Apr 10, 09:09:59
pentagon28, yeah, thats the? one..

Is that the same ...
By: pentagon28. on 02 Apr 10, 01:55:47
Is that the same David Icke, goalkeeper? and sports presenter who years ago suddenly announced that he was the Son of God?

Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Golf Career Videos

Citizen Investigation Team video compilations

Golf Career Related Videos

Golf Career Sponsors